Search Results

Pope Francis, 88, is undergoing intensive treatment for pneumonia and respiratory issues. His condition remains serious, but he is alert and receiving ongoing care. The global Catholic community unites in prayer for his recovery Pope Francis' Health Pope Francis, the 88-year-old leader of the Catholic Church, has faced a significant health decline over the past few days. Initially admitted to Rome's Gemelli Hospital on February 14, 2025, for bronchitis, his condition rapidly worsened, progressing to bilateral pneumonia. The Vatican’s health update on February 22 revealed that Pope Francis had suffered a prolonged asthmatic respiratory crisis, which required immediate and intensive medical intervention, including high-flow oxygen therapy and blood transfusions to address his worsening condition of anemia. Despite these treatments, Pope Francis remains in a serious condition, though he is still alert and has been seen sitting up. Medical experts remain cautious about his prognosis, though his ongoing care continues to be prioritized at the hospital. The Vatican has stated that his public engagements have been suspended for the time being, and there are no immediate plans for his return to public duties. During this challenging time, the global Catholic community has united in prayer for the Pope’s swift recovery. Special prayer services and masses have been held in Catholic Churches all over the world. Many faithful have expressed concern for the Holy Father, showing solidarity through various religious observances and prayers, hoping for his health to improve. Pope Francis continues to receive intensive medical care from a team of doctors and specialists. The Vatican has assured the public that all efforts are being made to stabilize his condition. For now, his health remains the focus, with updates expected as the medical team monitors his progress closely. As the situation develops, the Catholic Church and millions of its followers around the world are watching closely and praying for the Pope’s strength and recovery.

Welcome to the Question & Answer page, where faith meets clarity! Here, we address common questions about Christianity, the Bible, Church teachings, and spiritual life. Whether you're seeking deeper understanding or looking for answers to tough questions, explore insightful responses rooted in Scripture and tradition. Question and Answer Mary and Saints Why do Catholics pray to Saints? Is it biblical to ask the saints in heaven to pray for us? Catholics say yes, since we are all part of the communion of saints. As the word suggests, the communion of saints refers to the bond of unity among all believers, both living and dead, who are committed followers of Christ. In Christ, we are made part of God’s family (1 Tim 3:15), children of God (1 John 3:1), joint heirs with Christ (Rom 8:17), and partakers of the divine nature (2 Pet 1:4). This family communion of saints is known to Catholics as the Mystical Body of Christ. We are joined in a supernatural union as members of Christ’s own body, and thus as members of one another. Each of us participates in the divine life of Christ Himself. INTERCESSORY PRAYER What we have said about the communion of saints gives us the biblical reasons why Catholics ask the saints to intercede for them: (1) All Christians are members of Christ’s body and one another (Rom 12:5 and many others). (2) Jesus has only one body (Eph 4:4; Col 3:15). (3) Death cannot separate Christians from Christ or from one another (Rom 8:35-39). (4) Christians are bound in mutual love (Rom 12:10; 1 Thess 5:11; Gal 6:2). We are members of Christ’s one body, united in His divine life even beyond the grave, and concerned for each other’s salvation and growth in God’s family. In that union, we call for help and support from our older brothers and sisters who have already won their crown of glory. Just as in our human families we naturally turn to our siblings for aid and example, how much more should we turn to our supernatural family for help and inspiration. 1 Timothy 2:5-6 says, “For there is only one God and there is only one mediator between God and mankind, himself a man Christ Jesus.......” Does this not mean that there is no need for the intercession of the Saints? Are Catholics going against Scripture by asking Mary and other Saints to intercede for us? The Catholic Church believes that Jesus is the only mediator between God and man. But that does not exclude the mediation of others. In fact, the immediate context of 1 Timothy 2 shows the need for Christians to pray for others, exactly as Catholicism teaches. Let us look at the immediately preceding verses of 1 Tim. 2:1-5: “First of all, then, I urge that supplications, prayers, intercessions, and thanksgivings be made for all men…This is good, and it is acceptable in the sight of God our Savior….For there is one God, and there is one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus”. So, in the immediate context Paul urges people to pray for others. So obviously this text does not mean people should not intercede for others. When we pray to Saints, we are only asking them to pray for us. The intercession of the saints whether in heaven or earth does not rule out Christ’s universal mediation . Their mediation is not a replacement of Christ’s redemption. It could not be, because they themselves have been saved by God in Christ. There is, however, a secondary mediation , by which the faithful may obtain spiritual and material favours and graces. Their influence before God does not affect the fact that we believe that every one of us has been redeemed by Christ. The truth that Jesus Christ is the only mediator does not exclude secondary mediators who are always subordinate to and dependent on the one mediation of Jesus Christ. We have many examples of intercession in the Bible. In Genesis 18:22-23 we read of Abraham’s intercession for the inhabitants of Sodom and Gomorrah. In Genesis 19:21 the Bible speaks of the angel of the Lord who accepts Lot’s intercession for the town of Zoar. Moses interceded many times for his people as they journeyed to the promised land (Num 21:7; Deut 9:16-20, 25-29). Many other passages talk of intercession by people on behalf of others. Christ himself commands us to pray for each other especially for those who do wrong to us. This is nothing else but intercessory prayer. St. Paul says “pray for us” in Colossians 4:2-4 and again in 2 Thes 3:1, and many other places. Also Acts 7:59; Rom 15:30-31; Eph 6:18-19; Jas 5:16 etc. If we have the help of the saints on earth interceding for us, similarly the saints in heaven too are praying for us. Their mediation too brings down spiritual and material blessings on us. If it is pleasing to God that we ask living believers, the “saints on earth”, who can still ruin their lives through sin, to pray for us, surely it is more pleasing to God that we ask the “saints in heaven”, those who have ended their life in sanctity, and who cannot now sin, to pray for us. In the Old and New Testaments we have evidence of “saints in heaven” interceding for those on earth. The Jews believed in the intercession of the holy men who had departed from this life: “Then the Lord said to me, ‘Though Moses and Samuel stood before me, yet my heart would not turn toward this people’ (Jer. 15:1). Also see 2 Mac 15:11-16. The New Testament too reveals that the “saints in heaven” do play an intercessory role before God. In Lk. 16:19-31 Jesus presents Abraham, a “saint in heaven”, being asked to perform an intercessory role. And in Rev 5:8; 8:3-4 we have angels before God offering incense. Since incense stands for prayer, the prayers of the “saints on earth” were going up to God through the hand of this angel who is acting as an intercessor. Finally we say Jesus Christ is the only Saviour and Mediator. As far as remission of sins and salvation are concerned, our only Saviour is Christ, for he is the sacrifice that takes away our sins not only ours but those of the whole world (1 Jn 2:2); for he alone is “the Lamb of God who takes away the sins of the world” (Jn 1:29). He is also our only Mediator. But his mediation is inclusive, not exclusive. The mediation of the saints whether in heaven or on earth does not compromise the unique mediation of Jesus Christ. Those who pray to God do it “in and through Jesus Christ” and without the unique mediation of Jesus Christ the saints in heaven and on earth have no worth or value. Also, we must not have a non-Christian view of death, because death has not broken our communion with the departed. The faithful on earth are not in communion with the bodies of the saints buried in peace, but with their souls. Through baptism we become member of the mystical Body of Christ whose head is Jesus Christ. We form one communion of saints. So the saints can intercede for the living. Why do Catholics venerate/honour Blessed Virgin Mary? Catholics honour Mary because God honoured her above all creatures by bestowing upon her the highest dignity. Both the Angel and Elizabeth called her “blessed among women” (Lk 1:28, 42). Mary prophesied that henceforth all generations would call her blessed (Lk 1:48). In order to fulfill the Scripture we are not supposed just to venerate Our Lady, but also to congratulate her, that is to proclaim her happy, either by saying or singing as Elizabeth did, “Blessed are you, Mary”. Mary was uniquely blessed because she was entrusted with the honor of carrying God-in-human-form, Jesus Christ, in her womb. She alone was chosen for the highest honor in the history of the world. Catholics understand that if she is special enough for God to honor her, then she is certainly special enough for humankind to honor her too. We honour Mary because of her great privileges: In God’s plan of salvation Mary had a unique role to play – that is, a role given to no other woman. She was chosen to be the mother of Jesus, the incarnate word of God and our Saviour. She was conceived without sin (the Immaculate Conception) and she also conceived Jesus without human intervention. She became the mother of Jesus who is God. Jesus honoured her by being with her for thirty years and then showed his love to her on the Cross when he left her to the care of John. (Jn 19:25 and following). We honour her because Jesus honoured her by obeying her words. He performed his first sign at her request, by changing water into wine (Jn 2:1-12). Above all we honour her because she is the model of Christian believers. Mary was totally open to God and to his word in her life (Lk1:38). It will be absurd to claim that Mary finished her role as soon as she gave birth to Jesus. In fact Jesus from the cross declares to Mary that, from that crucial moment on, she would have a new role to play to look after her sons and daughters “Seeing his mother and the disciple he loved standing near her, Jesus said to his mother: ‘Woman, this is your son!’ Then to the disciple he said ‘This is your mother.’ And from that moment the disciple made a place for her in his home” (Jn 19:26-27) Mary is the masterpiece of God’s creation. Is the artist jealous of the praise given to his masterpiece? The praise given to Mary goes to God. By honouring Mary we are honouring God. Perpetual Virginity of Mary: Was Mary virgin forever or did Mary had other children besides Jesus and therefore she cannot be “forever a virgin” as Catholics call her. Three difficulties have been brought up against the continued virginity of Mary: a) Some say this because in St Luke’s gospel 2:7, it is written “and she gave birth to her first–born son”. Doesn’t that mean that Jesus was the first of several more? Mary must have had a second or third child. “Firstborn” is actually a legal term meaning that no one was born before. It does not necessarily mean that someone was born after. The first one to open the mother’s womb was consecrated to God (Ex 13:2, Num 3:12), even if no second child followed. Under Mosaic Law, it was the “first-born” son that was to be redeemed (Ex 34:20). Jesus was given the title of ‘first-born’ to show, not only that Mary gave birth to no child before him, but also because it is a title of honour. In that society, to be first-born conferred special rights and duties. Remember, too, that Christ is the ‘first-born’ of the Father, but he is also the ONLY SON. So, we cannot say that ‘first-born’ means that there must be others. b) It is mentioned that “Joseph did not know (i.e. did not have any sexual relations with) her till she brought forth a son” (Mt 1:25). Doesn’t “till” mean that afterwards they lived normally as a man and wife? The phrase “Joseph did not know Mary until she gave birth to Jesus” is a Semitic way of emphasizing a point. Mathew uses it to emphasize the virginal conception of Jesus. In the Bible ‘until’ only affirms that an action did not take place up to a certain point of time. It is talking only about the past and saying nothing about the future. Obviously, the gospel writer wants to show that Jesus’ birth had nothing to do with any physical contact between Mary and Joseph, otherwise Jesus would be an ordinary man. If the modern sense is forced on the Bible, some ridiculous meanings result. In Psalm 110:1 we read, “The Lord said to my Lord, sit at my right hand till I make your enemies your footstool.” Does this mean that Christ will not sit at the right hand of the Father any more after the defeat of his enemies? In 2 Samuel 6:23 it says, “Michal had no children until her death”. This does not mean that she had children after her death. In Mt 28:20 “(Jesus said to his disciples): And behold, I am with you always until the end of the age.” This does not mean that Jesus the Lord will stop being with us after the end of this world. We must also be careful about lifting out one verse and trying to prove something with that alone and not taking into account the rest of the Bible or the setting of the verse. c) Another objection, which is brought against the perpetual virginity of Mary: verses that speak of “brothers and sisters of Jesus” (Mk 3:31, 6:3, Mt 13:55-56). Again, we have to emphasize that the books of the Bible were not written in English. In a Semitic language, the word ‘brother’ can also mean a cousin or any male relation or even just a member of the same tribe. For example, in Genesis 14:12 & 16 we read, “when Abraham recaptured all the goods, along with his brother Lot….” Yet we know from other passages that Lot was Abraham’s brother’s son – Abraham’s nephew, in fact. In Gen 29:15, “brother” is again used to mean “nephew.” The so-called “brothers and sisters” of Jesus are never said anywhere to be sons and daughters of Mary. Those whom the New Testament calls “brothers of Jesus are James the Less, and Joseph, Jude, and Simon. But the New Testament even mentions their parents – in Mt 10:3 James is said to be the son of Alphaeus (he is different from James, son of Zebedee and Salome). Regarding Jude himself, it is said in Jude 1, “From Jude, servant of Jesus Christ and brother of James.” John the evangelist reports that when Jesus was dying, he turned to Mary and said, “Woman, this is your son”. Then he turned to disciple and said, “This is your mother.” Surely, if Mary had other children besides Jesus, he would not have entrusted her to his disciple John, who would have been an outsider in comparison with a brother and a sister. At other times Jesus refers to his apostles and disciples as “brothers”: “Go and find my brothers and tell them…” (John 20:17). You will see the same in Mt 28:10. In the Acts of the Apostles 1:15: “Peter stood up one day to speak to the brothers. There were hundred and twenty persons in the congregation.” Can this really mean that there were 120 people who were sons and daughters of the same man and woman? There are, of course, other examples in the Acts of the Apostles. In conclusion, we say that Mary is the mother only of Jesus. He is called “the son of Mary”, not “a son of Mary” – Mk 6:3 Mary is called the mother of God. Is Mary the mother of God the Father? First of all, it is good to realize what we mean by the title “Mother of God”. By this title ‘Mother of God,’ we mean the Mother of Jesus who is God. This title ‘Mother of God’ is not meant as a mark of honour to Mary but as a safeguard to a right understanding of Jesus i.e. he is one person two natures: divine and human. This title of ‘Mother of God’ was given to Mary in the early Church against those who affirmed that Mary is the mother only of Jesus the man. The Church in this context responded by clarifying that in Jesus there is only one person, the divine person who takes flesh in the womb of Mary. The Church teaches that Mary “gave birth to the Word of God become flesh by birth” to make it clear that Mary was not the mother of Jesus’ divinity. Mary did not give birth to God from all eternity or in the beginning of time. In fact, she was merely a “handmaid” of the Lord.” She was the mother of Jesus who was “God among us.” Since Jesus is true God and true Man, united in the one Person of God’s Word, to deny that Mary is the Mother of God would be to deny either that Jesus is God or that Mary is truly his mother. Even though the title ‘Mother of God’ is not in Scripture, we do find a basis for this title in the words of Elizabeth where she calls Mary the ‘Mother of my Lord’ (Lk 1:43). The title ‘Lord’ was given to God in the Old Testament. In the New Testament Jesus is also called Lord. Mary is the mother of this divine person in his human nature. How can Catholics believe in Mary’s full innocence, that is, the Immaculate Conception? In the Bible, Mary said, “My spirit exults in God my Saviour.” Does this not mean that Mary was saved from sin? When we say that Mary was immaculately conceived, we mean that Mary was conceived without original sin or its stain—that’s what "immaculate" means: without stain. Mary from the first instant of her existence was in the state of sanctifying grace and was free from the corrupt nature which original sin brings. God’s salvation which, delivers sinners from their actual faults (Mt 1:21) is powerful enough even to prevent a person committing sin or even being affected by sin. God’s power is infinite! The grace Mary enjoyed not only has been as “full” or strong or complete, but it has extended over the whole of her life, from conception. That is, she has been in a state of sanctifying grace from the first moment of her existence that is why she is called “full of grace” (Lk 1:28). Now the Greek word “kecharitomene” is used of a person who has received special favours. Mary, therefore, is a highly privileged virgin: “Blessed are you among women”. Mary was redeemed by the grace of Christ, but in a special way, by anticipation this is what doctrine of the Immaculate Conception is all about. Mary herself proclaims gratefully, “For the Almighty has done great things for me; holy is his name.” Among those great things to which the Blessed Virgin is referring is her preservation from the stain of evil and sin The Immaculate Conception thus does not remove Mary from the number of the redeemed. We are not claiming that she was not in need of redemption. She was as much in need of redemption as anyone else. We claim for her that she was redeemed in a special way by the merits of Jesus. Rather, she is even more redeemed, most perfectly redeemed. She is for us an example of what the redemption of Jesus means, total discipleship where there is nothing of Satan’s reign. And all this is not because of her own merits, but because of Christ’s grace, because God chose her to be the mother of his Son. Was Mary assumed into Heaven? This is what the Catholic Church believes: that Mary ever virgin at the end of her earthly life was assumed body and soul into heaven. It is also necessary to know that assumption is not ascension. Mary was assumed or taken up into heaven by God. She didn’t do it under her own power. But Christ ascended into heaven by his own power Even though there is no direct, explicit reference to the assumption of Mary in the Bible, there is some scriptural support for the concept of bodily assumption. We see both Enoch and Elijah, the righteous persons in the Old Testament were assumed into heaven (Heb. 11:5, 2 Kgs. 2:11). Also in Mt. 27:52-53 we see that after the resurrection of Jesus many righteous people rose from their tombs body and soul: “and the graves were opened and many bodies arose out of them, bodies of holy men gone to their rest: who, after his rising again, left their graves and went into the holy city:” The early resurrection of these saints anticipated the rising of those who die in faith, all of who will be assumed one day to receive their glorified bodies. The above cases in the Old and New Testaments prepare us for the Assumption of Mary, the most righteous person of the human race in God’s plan of salvation. We find this truth enshrined in the resurrection of Christ and in our own resurrection. If Christ is the “first fruits” of those who have died (1 Cor 15:20), Mary becomes for us the tangible fruit of Christ’s resurrection. She becomes the prototype of our own resurrection. In Assumption of Mary, we see our Christian hope, which testifies to the power of Jesus in redeeming us at the time of the resurrection of our body. In the Assumption of Mary, we see what God’s grace does to each of us at the end of our lives. In Mary, the disciple of Jesus, we see the full fruit of Christ’s redemption both at the beginning and at the end of her life. If the Ark of the Covenant in the Old Testament which contained the manna (bread from heaven), the stone tablets of the Ten Commandments (the Word of God), and the staff of Aaron (a symbol of Israel’s high priesthood) was given so much honour, how much more should Mary be kept from corruption, since she is the New Ark—who carried the real bread from heaven, the Word of God, and the High Priest of the New Covenant, Jesus Christ. After all, if Mary is immaculately conceived, then it would follow that she would not suffer corruption in the grave, which is a consequence of sin [Gen. 3:17, 19]. This is what St. Robert Bellarmine says: "Who could believe that the ark of holiness, the dwelling of God, the temple of the Holy Spirit [i.e., Mary], crumbled into dust? I shudder at the very thought that the virginal flesh of which God was conceived and born, which nourished him and carried him should have turned to ashes or been given as food to worms." Did Mother Mary die? We believe that Mary being the mother of Jesus was assumed into heaven body and soul at the end of her life. But the question here is whether she was assumed into heaven before or after her death. Did Mary experience bodily death? When Pope Pius XII in 1950 defined the dogma of the Assumption of Mary with the words “The immaculate Mother of God, Mary, ever virgin, when the course of her earthly life was finished, was taken up body and soul into the glory of heaven.” ”The wording of the dogmatic teaching by Pius XII leaves the question unanswered. The text simply says: “when the course of her earthly life was finished….” The text does not say whether Mary died or did not die. The fact that Pius XII did not define that Our Lady died when he defined her bodily Assumption it has been taken by many to mean that she did not die. But the death of Mary is taken for granted by many writers both in eastern and western Christianity who speak of her Assumption, the earliest documents, e.g. the apocryphal “Transitus Mariae,” and later the feast of the Dormition (5th cent.) imply her death. In the preface of the Mass of the Assumption the Church prays ”Today the virgin Mother of God was taken up into heaven to be the beginning and the pattern of the Church in its perfection, and a sign of hope and comfort for your people on their pilgrim way. You would not allow decay to touch her body, for she had given birth to you Son, the Lord of all life, in the glory of the incarnation.” What “decay'' is being referred to in this prayer? The “decay” refers to the corruption of the body that takes place after death. And this decay Mary was not subjected to. And so the tradition both in east and west has leaned towards the belief that she did die prior to her assumption But some theologians feel that, since death is a consequence of sin, and that Mary was conceived immaculately, born without original sin and she was sinless she would have had not died. To this some feel that, since Jesus himself chose to die, wouldn’t it be fitting for his mother to have shared the same fate? The Mother is not superior to the Son who underwent death” Whether Mary died or not no official pronouncements have been made. The definition of the Assumption is silent on the question of her death. Pope Pius XII while giving the dogma of Assumption refrained from saying Mary died before her assumption even though in the document itself Pope Pius XII referred to writings of the early church that she died. The official position of the Church is that we are not sure whether she died or not but rather we focus and believe in the Assumption of Mary into heaven and celebrate this Solemnity with the hope that we too like her will be in heaven with the Lord after our death. Why was 15th August selected to celebrate the feast of Assumption? The dogma on Assumption of Mary into heaven was declared after India's independence on 15th Augusut, 1947? The tradition of Assumption of Mary into heaven was already proclaimed as early as 749 by St. John Damascene. In 1568 Pope Pius V made the feast of the Assumption of Mary into heaven a holy day for the entire Church. In the early church the date of 15th August was celebrated as feast of Mary's dormition or "falling asleep". This feast which originated in the Byzantine Empire probably in the 5th century came into the Western Church but the term dormition was replaced by “Assumption”. Pope Pius XII defined the dogma of the Assumption of Blessed Virgin Mary into heaven as doctrine of faith in his Encyclical “Munificentissimus Deus” on 1 November 1950, but the belief in the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary in heaven and the feast celebrated on 15th August goes back to early church and long before our country’s independence on 15th August 1947. 01 Why do Catholics pray to Saints? Is it biblical to ask the saints in heaven to pray for us? Catholics say yes, since we are all part of the communion of saints. As the word suggests, the communion of saints refers to the bond of unity among all believers, both living and dead, who are committed followers of Christ. In Christ, we are made part of God’s family (1 Tim 3:15), children of God (1 John 3:1), joint heirs with Christ (Rom 8:17), and partakers of the divine nature (2 Pet 1:4). This family communion of saints is known to Catholics as the Mystical Body of Christ. We are joined in a supernatural union as members of Christ’s own body, and thus as members of one another. Each of us participates in the divine life of Christ Himself. INTERCESSORY PRAYER What we have said about the communion of saints gives us the biblical reasons why Catholics ask the saints to intercede for them: (1) All Christians are members of Christ’s body and one another (Rom 12:5 and many others). (2) Jesus has only one body (Eph 4:4; Col 3:15). (3) Death cannot separate Christians from Christ or from one another (Rom 8:35-39). (4) Christians are bound in mutual love (Rom 12:10; 1 Thess 5:11; Gal 6:2). We are members of Christ’s one body, united in His divine life even beyond the grave, and concerned for each other’s salvation and growth in God’s family. In that union, we call for help and support from our older brothers and sisters who have already won their crown of glory. Just as in our human families we naturally turn to our siblings for aid and example, how much more should we turn to our supernatural family for help and inspiration. 02 1 Timothy 2:5-6 says, “For there is only one God and there is only one mediator between God and mankind, himself a man Christ Jesus.......” Does this not mean that there is no need for the intercession of the Saints? Are Catholics going against Scripture by asking Mary and other Saints to intercede for us? The Catholic Church believes that Jesus is the only mediator between God and man. But that does not exclude the mediation of others. In fact, the immediate context of 1 Timothy 2 shows the need for Christians to pray for others, exactly as Catholicism teaches. Let us look at the immediately preceding verses of 1 Tim. 2:1-5: “First of all, then, I urge that supplications, prayers, intercessions, and thanksgivings be made for all men…This is good, and it is acceptable in the sight of God our Savior….For there is one God, and there is one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus”. So, in the immediate context Paul urges people to pray for others. So obviously this text does not mean people should not intercede for others. When we pray to Saints, we are only asking them to pray for us. The intercession of the saints whether in heaven or earth does not rule out Christ’s universal mediation . Their mediation is not a replacement of Christ’s redemption. It could not be, because they themselves have been saved by God in Christ. There is, however, a secondary mediation , by which the faithful may obtain spiritual and material favours and graces. Their influence before God does not affect the fact that we believe that every one of us has been redeemed by Christ. The truth that Jesus Christ is the only mediator does not exclude secondary mediators who are always subordinate to and dependent on the one mediation of Jesus Christ. We have many examples of intercession in the Bible. In Genesis 18:22-23 we read of Abraham’s intercession for the inhabitants of Sodom and Gomorrah. In Genesis 19:21 the Bible speaks of the angel of the Lord who accepts Lot’s intercession for the town of Zoar. Moses interceded many times for his people as they journeyed to the promised land (Num 21:7; Deut 9:16-20, 25-29). Many other passages talk of intercession by people on behalf of others. Christ himself commands us to pray for each other especially for those who do wrong to us. This is nothing else but intercessory prayer. St. Paul says “pray for us” in Colossians 4:2-4 and again in 2 Thes 3:1, and many other places. Also Acts 7:59; Rom 15:30-31; Eph 6:18-19; Jas 5:16 etc. If we have the help of the saints on earth interceding for us, similarly the saints in heaven too are praying for us. Their mediation too brings down spiritual and material blessings on us. If it is pleasing to God that we ask living believers, the “saints on earth”, who can still ruin their lives through sin, to pray for us, surely it is more pleasing to God that we ask the “saints in heaven”, those who have ended their life in sanctity, and who cannot now sin, to pray for us. In the Old and New Testaments we have evidence of “saints in heaven” interceding for those on earth. The Jews believed in the intercession of the holy men who had departed from this life: “Then the Lord said to me, ‘Though Moses and Samuel stood before me, yet my heart would not turn toward this people’ (Jer. 15:1). Also see 2 Mac 15:11-16. The New Testament too reveals that the “saints in heaven” do play an intercessory role before God. In Lk. 16:19-31 Jesus presents Abraham, a “saint in heaven”, being asked to perform an intercessory role. And in Rev 5:8; 8:3-4 we have angels before God offering incense. Since incense stands for prayer, the prayers of the “saints on earth” were going up to God through the hand of this angel who is acting as an intercessor. Finally we say Jesus Christ is the only Saviour and Mediator. As far as remission of sins and salvation are concerned, our only Saviour is Christ, for he is the sacrifice that takes away our sins not only ours but those of the whole world (1 Jn 2:2); for he alone is “the Lamb of God who takes away the sins of the world” (Jn 1:29). He is also our only Mediator. But his mediation is inclusive, not exclusive. The mediation of the saints whether in heaven or on earth does not compromise the unique mediation of Jesus Christ. Those who pray to God do it “in and through Jesus Christ” and without the unique mediation of Jesus Christ the saints in heaven and on earth have no worth or value. Also, we must not have a non-Christian view of death, because death has not broken our communion with the departed. The faithful on earth are not in communion with the bodies of the saints buried in peace, but with their souls. Through baptism we become member of the mystical Body of Christ whose head is Jesus Christ. We form one communion of saints. So the saints can intercede for the living. 03 Why do Catholics venerate/honour Blessed Virgin Mary? Catholics honour Mary because God honoured her above all creatures by bestowing upon her the highest dignity. Both the Angel and Elizabeth called her “blessed among women” (Lk 1:28, 42). Mary prophesied that henceforth all generations would call her blessed (Lk 1:48). In order to fulfill the Scripture we are not supposed just to venerate Our Lady, but also to congratulate her, that is to proclaim her happy, either by saying or singing as Elizabeth did, “Blessed are you, Mary”. Mary was uniquely blessed because she was entrusted with the honor of carrying God-in-human-form, Jesus Christ, in her womb. She alone was chosen for the highest honor in the history of the world. Catholics understand that if she is special enough for God to honor her, then she is certainly special enough for humankind to honor her too. We honour Mary because of her great privileges: In God’s plan of salvation Mary had a unique role to play – that is, a role given to no other woman. She was chosen to be the mother of Jesus, the incarnate word of God and our Saviour. She was conceived without sin (the Immaculate Conception) and she also conceived Jesus without human intervention. She became the mother of Jesus who is God. Jesus honoured her by being with her for thirty years and then showed his love to her on the Cross when he left her to the care of John. (Jn 19:25 and following). We honour her because Jesus honoured her by obeying her words. He performed his first sign at her request, by changing water into wine (Jn 2:1-12). Above all we honour her because she is the model of Christian believers. Mary was totally open to God and to his word in her life (Lk1:38). It will be absurd to claim that Mary finished her role as soon as she gave birth to Jesus. In fact Jesus from the cross declares to Mary that, from that crucial moment on, she would have a new role to play to look after her sons and daughters “Seeing his mother and the disciple he loved standing near her, Jesus said to his mother: ‘Woman, this is your son!’ Then to the disciple he said ‘This is your mother.’ And from that moment the disciple made a place for her in his home” (Jn 19:26-27) Mary is the masterpiece of God’s creation. Is the artist jealous of the praise given to his masterpiece? The praise given to Mary goes to God. By honouring Mary we are honouring God. 04 Perpetual Virginity of Mary: Was Mary virgin forever or did Mary had other children besides Jesus and therefore she cannot be “forever a virgin” as Catholics call her. Three difficulties have been brought up against the continued virginity of Mary: a) Some say this because in St Luke’s gospel 2:7, it is written “and she gave birth to her first–born son”. Doesn’t that mean that Jesus was the first of several more? Mary must have had a second or third child. “Firstborn” is actually a legal term meaning that no one was born before. It does not necessarily mean that someone was born after. The first one to open the mother’s womb was consecrated to God (Ex 13:2, Num 3:12), even if no second child followed. Under Mosaic Law, it was the “first-born” son that was to be redeemed (Ex 34:20). Jesus was given the title of ‘first-born’ to show, not only that Mary gave birth to no child before him, but also because it is a title of honour. In that society, to be first-born conferred special rights and duties. Remember, too, that Christ is the ‘first-born’ of the Father, but he is also the ONLY SON. So, we cannot say that ‘first-born’ means that there must be others. b) It is mentioned that “Joseph did not know (i.e. did not have any sexual relations with) her till she brought forth a son” (Mt 1:25). Doesn’t “till” mean that afterwards they lived normally as a man and wife? The phrase “Joseph did not know Mary until she gave birth to Jesus” is a Semitic way of emphasizing a point. Mathew uses it to emphasize the virginal conception of Jesus. In the Bible ‘until’ only affirms that an action did not take place up to a certain point of time. It is talking only about the past and saying nothing about the future. Obviously, the gospel writer wants to show that Jesus’ birth had nothing to do with any physical contact between Mary and Joseph, otherwise Jesus would be an ordinary man. If the modern sense is forced on the Bible, some ridiculous meanings result. In Psalm 110:1 we read, “The Lord said to my Lord, sit at my right hand till I make your enemies your footstool.” Does this mean that Christ will not sit at the right hand of the Father any more after the defeat of his enemies? In 2 Samuel 6:23 it says, “Michal had no children until her death”. This does not mean that she had children after her death. In Mt 28:20 “(Jesus said to his disciples): And behold, I am with you always until the end of the age.” This does not mean that Jesus the Lord will stop being with us after the end of this world. We must also be careful about lifting out one verse and trying to prove something with that alone and not taking into account the rest of the Bible or the setting of the verse. c) Another objection, which is brought against the perpetual virginity of Mary: verses that speak of “brothers and sisters of Jesus” (Mk 3:31, 6:3, Mt 13:55-56). Again, we have to emphasize that the books of the Bible were not written in English. In a Semitic language, the word ‘brother’ can also mean a cousin or any male relation or even just a member of the same tribe. For example, in Genesis 14:12 & 16 we read, “when Abraham recaptured all the goods, along with his brother Lot….” Yet we know from other passages that Lot was Abraham’s brother’s son – Abraham’s nephew, in fact. In Gen 29:15, “brother” is again used to mean “nephew.” The so-called “brothers and sisters” of Jesus are never said anywhere to be sons and daughters of Mary. Those whom the New Testament calls “brothers of Jesus are James the Less, and Joseph, Jude, and Simon. But the New Testament even mentions their parents – in Mt 10:3 James is said to be the son of Alphaeus (he is different from James, son of Zebedee and Salome). Regarding Jude himself, it is said in Jude 1, “From Jude, servant of Jesus Christ and brother of James.” John the evangelist reports that when Jesus was dying, he turned to Mary and said, “Woman, this is your son”. Then he turned to disciple and said, “This is your mother.” Surely, if Mary had other children besides Jesus, he would not have entrusted her to his disciple John, who would have been an outsider in comparison with a brother and a sister. At other times Jesus refers to his apostles and disciples as “brothers”: “Go and find my brothers and tell them…” (John 20:17). You will see the same in Mt 28:10. In the Acts of the Apostles 1:15: “Peter stood up one day to speak to the brothers. There were hundred and twenty persons in the congregation.” Can this really mean that there were 120 people who were sons and daughters of the same man and woman? There are, of course, other examples in the Acts of the Apostles. In conclusion, we say that Mary is the mother only of Jesus. He is called “the son of Mary”, not “a son of Mary” – Mk 6:3 05 Mary is called the mother of God. Is Mary the mother of God the Father? First of all, it is good to realize what we mean by the title “Mother of God”. By this title ‘Mother of God,’ we mean the Mother of Jesus who is God. This title ‘Mother of God’ is not meant as a mark of honour to Mary but as a safeguard to a right understanding of Jesus i.e. he is one person two natures: divine and human. This title of ‘Mother of God’ was given to Mary in the early Church against those who affirmed that Mary is the mother only of Jesus the man. The Church in this context responded by clarifying that in Jesus there is only one person, the divine person who takes flesh in the womb of Mary. The Church teaches that Mary “gave birth to the Word of God become flesh by birth” to make it clear that Mary was not the mother of Jesus’ divinity. Mary did not give birth to God from all eternity or in the beginning of time. In fact, she was merely a “handmaid” of the Lord.” She was the mother of Jesus who was “God among us.” Since Jesus is true God and true Man, united in the one Person of God’s Word, to deny that Mary is the Mother of God would be to deny either that Jesus is God or that Mary is truly his mother. Even though the title ‘Mother of God’ is not in Scripture, we do find a basis for this title in the words of Elizabeth where she calls Mary the ‘Mother of my Lord’ (Lk 1:43). The title ‘Lord’ was given to God in the Old Testament. In the New Testament Jesus is also called Lord. Mary is the mother of this divine person in his human nature. 06 How can Catholics believe in Mary’s full innocence, that is, the Immaculate Conception? In the Bible, Mary said, “My spirit exults in God my Saviour.” Does this not mean that Mary was saved from sin? When we say that Mary was immaculately conceived, we mean that Mary was conceived without original sin or its stain—that’s what "immaculate" means: without stain. Mary from the first instant of her existence was in the state of sanctifying grace and was free from the corrupt nature which original sin brings. God’s salvation which, delivers sinners from their actual faults (Mt 1:21) is powerful enough even to prevent a person committing sin or even being affected by sin. God’s power is infinite! The grace Mary enjoyed not only has been as “full” or strong or complete, but it has extended over the whole of her life, from conception. That is, she has been in a state of sanctifying grace from the first moment of her existence that is why she is called “full of grace” (Lk 1:28). Now the Greek word “kecharitomene” is used of a person who has received special favours. Mary, therefore, is a highly privileged virgin: “Blessed are you among women”. Mary was redeemed by the grace of Christ, but in a special way, by anticipation this is what doctrine of the Immaculate Conception is all about. Mary herself proclaims gratefully, “For the Almighty has done great things for me; holy is his name.” Among those great things to which the Blessed Virgin is referring is her preservation from the stain of evil and sin The Immaculate Conception thus does not remove Mary from the number of the redeemed. We are not claiming that she was not in need of redemption. She was as much in need of redemption as anyone else. We claim for her that she was redeemed in a special way by the merits of Jesus. Rather, she is even more redeemed, most perfectly redeemed. She is for us an example of what the redemption of Jesus means, total discipleship where there is nothing of Satan’s reign. And all this is not because of her own merits, but because of Christ’s grace, because God chose her to be the mother of his Son. 07 Was Mary assumed into Heaven? This is what the Catholic Church believes: that Mary ever virgin at the end of her earthly life was assumed body and soul into heaven. It is also necessary to know that assumption is not ascension. Mary was assumed or taken up into heaven by God. She didn’t do it under her own power. But Christ ascended into heaven by his own power Even though there is no direct, explicit reference to the assumption of Mary in the Bible, there is some scriptural support for the concept of bodily assumption. We see both Enoch and Elijah, the righteous persons in the Old Testament were assumed into heaven (Heb. 11:5, 2 Kgs. 2:11). Also in Mt. 27:52-53 we see that after the resurrection of Jesus many righteous people rose from their tombs body and soul: “and the graves were opened and many bodies arose out of them, bodies of holy men gone to their rest: who, after his rising again, left their graves and went into the holy city:” The early resurrection of these saints anticipated the rising of those who die in faith, all of who will be assumed one day to receive their glorified bodies. The above cases in the Old and New Testaments prepare us for the Assumption of Mary, the most righteous person of the human race in God’s plan of salvation. We find this truth enshrined in the resurrection of Christ and in our own resurrection. If Christ is the “first fruits” of those who have died (1 Cor 15:20), Mary becomes for us the tangible fruit of Christ’s resurrection. She becomes the prototype of our own resurrection. In Assumption of Mary, we see our Christian hope, which testifies to the power of Jesus in redeeming us at the time of the resurrection of our body. In the Assumption of Mary, we see what God’s grace does to each of us at the end of our lives. In Mary, the disciple of Jesus, we see the full fruit of Christ’s redemption both at the beginning and at the end of her life. If the Ark of the Covenant in the Old Testament which contained the manna (bread from heaven), the stone tablets of the Ten Commandments (the Word of God), and the staff of Aaron (a symbol of Israel’s high priesthood) was given so much honour, how much more should Mary be kept from corruption, since she is the New Ark—who carried the real bread from heaven, the Word of God, and the High Priest of the New Covenant, Jesus Christ. After all, if Mary is immaculately conceived, then it would follow that she would not suffer corruption in the grave, which is a consequence of sin [Gen. 3:17, 19]. This is what St. Robert Bellarmine says: "Who could believe that the ark of holiness, the dwelling of God, the temple of the Holy Spirit [i.e., Mary], crumbled into dust? I shudder at the very thought that the virginal flesh of which God was conceived and born, which nourished him and carried him should have turned to ashes or been given as food to worms." 08 Did Mother Mary die? We believe that Mary being the mother of Jesus was assumed into heaven body and soul at the end of her life. But the question here is whether she was assumed into heaven before or after her death. Did Mary experience bodily death? When Pope Pius XII in 1950 defined the dogma of the Assumption of Mary with the words “The immaculate Mother of God, Mary, ever virgin, when the course of her earthly life was finished, was taken up body and soul into the glory of heaven.” ”The wording of the dogmatic teaching by Pius XII leaves the question unanswered. The text simply says: “when the course of her earthly life was finished….” The text does not say whether Mary died or did not die. The fact that Pius XII did not define that Our Lady died when he defined her bodily Assumption it has been taken by many to mean that she did not die. But the death of Mary is taken for granted by many writers both in eastern and western Christianity who speak of her Assumption, the earliest documents, e.g. the apocryphal “Transitus Mariae,” and later the feast of the Dormition (5th cent.) imply her death. In the preface of the Mass of the Assumption the Church prays ”Today the virgin Mother of God was taken up into heaven to be the beginning and the pattern of the Church in its perfection, and a sign of hope and comfort for your people on their pilgrim way. You would not allow decay to touch her body, for she had given birth to you Son, the Lord of all life, in the glory of the incarnation.” What “decay'' is being referred to in this prayer? The “decay” refers to the corruption of the body that takes place after death. And this decay Mary was not subjected to. And so the tradition both in east and west has leaned towards the belief that she did die prior to her assumption But some theologians feel that, since death is a consequence of sin, and that Mary was conceived immaculately, born without original sin and she was sinless she would have had not died. To this some feel that, since Jesus himself chose to die, wouldn’t it be fitting for his mother to have shared the same fate? The Mother is not superior to the Son who underwent death” Whether Mary died or not no official pronouncements have been made. The definition of the Assumption is silent on the question of her death. Pope Pius XII while giving the dogma of Assumption refrained from saying Mary died before her assumption even though in the document itself Pope Pius XII referred to writings of the early church that she died. The official position of the Church is that we are not sure whether she died or not but rather we focus and believe in the Assumption of Mary into heaven and celebrate this Solemnity with the hope that we too like her will be in heaven with the Lord after our death. 09 Why was 15th August selected to celebrate the feast of Assumption? The dogma on Assumption of Mary into heaven was declared after India's independence on 15th Augusut, 1947? The tradition of Assumption of Mary into heaven was already proclaimed as early as 749 by St. John Damascene. In 1568 Pope Pius V made the feast of the Assumption of Mary into heaven a holy day for the entire Church. In the early church the date of 15th August was celebrated as feast of Mary's dormition or "falling asleep". This feast which originated in the Byzantine Empire probably in the 5th century came into the Western Church but the term dormition was replaced by “Assumption”. Pope Pius XII defined the dogma of the Assumption of Blessed Virgin Mary into heaven as doctrine of faith in his Encyclical “Munificentissimus Deus” on 1 November 1950, but the belief in the Assumption of the Blessed Virgin Mary in heaven and the feast celebrated on 15th August goes back to early church and long before our country’s independence on 15th August 1947. Your Question Submit Thanks for submitting!

Reflection on Jesus' teachings in Luke 6:39-45 for the Eighth Sunday in Ordinary Time (Year C). Explore the dangers of spiritual blindness, the need for humility, and how our actions reveal the true state of our hearts. Discover the call to true discipleship, self-examination, and bearing good fruit in our daily lives True Discipleship – Walking in the Light of Christ Today’s Gospel presents us with profound wisdom about discipleship, self-examination, and the true measure of a virtuous life. Jesus warns against spiritual blindness, hypocrisy, and the dangers of judging others while failing to recognize our own faults. He reminds us that our actions and words flow from the depths of our hearts, just as a tree is known by its fruit. Let us reflect on three key lessons from today’s reading. 1. The Blind Leading the Blind: The Need for True Spiritual Vision Jesus asks, "Can one blind man guide another? Surely both will fall into a pit?" (Luke 6:39). This is a sobering warning for those who take on the responsibility of leading others, whether as parents, teachers, priests, or mentors. The disciples of Jesus were to be the future teachers of the world, and so they needed to be enlightened by divine wisdom. How can one who lacks knowledge, virtue, and holiness guide others towards the truth? A disciple is not greater than his teacher, but he must strive to be like his teacher. If we claim to be followers of Christ, we must follow His example of humility, mercy, and love. St. Paul reminds us: “Be imitators of me, as I am of Christ.” (1 Cor 11:1). If Christ does not judge but instead shows mercy, why should we judge? If we struggle with sin and yet try to correct others, we are like the blind leading the blind. First, we must allow Christ to heal our spiritual blindness before we can lead others. 2. The Splinter and the Plank: The Danger of Hypocrisy Jesus then asks, "Why do you observe the splinter in your brother’s eye and never notice the plank in your own?" (Luke 6:41). The image is striking. A small speck of dust compared to a massive wooden beam—this is how Jesus describes our tendency to judge others while ignoring our own serious faults. The plank represents grievous sin, while the splinter symbolizes minor faults. How often do we magnify the shortcomings of others while excusing our own failures? This is especially relevant for those in positions of authority. A preacher who condemns minor sins while neglecting his own is a hypocrite. True self-knowledge is essential. As St. Augustine says, “Lord, let me know myself, and let me know Thee.” Before we try to correct others, we must first purify our own hearts. Jesus does not say we should never correct others, but that correction must come from a place of humility and love, not self-righteousness. 3. A Tree and Its Fruit: The Heart as the Source of Good or Evil Jesus uses a powerful image: "There is no sound tree that produces rotten fruit, nor again a rotten tree that produces sound fruit." (Luke 6:43). The fruit of a tree tells us what kind of tree it is, just as our actions reveal the state of our hearts. Our external religious practices mean nothing if our hearts are not pure. As St. Teresa of Avila says, "What matters is not whether we wear a religious habit, but whether we live according to God’s will." What fills our hearts will overflow into our words and deeds. If our hearts are filled with bitterness, pride, and anger, our actions will reflect that. If they are filled with love, humility, and mercy, we will bear good fruit. True holiness is not just about words but about perseverance in good works. St. Ambrose reminds us, "The one who hears the Gospel but does not put it into practice denies Christ. The true witness is the one who fulfills His commandments." Conclusion: Living as True Disciples of Christ Dear brothers and sisters, today’s Gospel challenges us to examine our hearts and our way of life. Are we spiritually blind, trying to guide others without first seeking the light of Christ? Do we judge others harshly while ignoring our own faults? Are our hearts truly aligned with God’s will, bearing good fruit? Let us seek self-knowledge, practice humility, and strive for inner purification so that we may truly follow Christ and lead others to Him. May our hearts be filled with His love so that our words and actions may reflect His truth.

After 37 days in hospital, the Holy Father is back at the Vatican, showing remarkable improvement. He continues his recovery with rest, therapy, and limited public activity. Pope Francis' Recovery Journey: Steady Progress and a Spirit of Healing After spending 37 days at Gemelli Hospital, Pope Francis has now been back at the Vatican for a full week—and according to his doctors, he’s on the right path to recovery. On Saturday, March 29, Dr. Sergio Alfieri, the surgeon who treated him, described the Pope’s condition as showing “a truly surprising improvement,” even calling him “very lively.” During a routine medical visit on March 26, Dr. Alfieri remarked, “If he doesn’t return to 100%, he’ll definitely reach 90% of what he was before.” The Pope’s voice continues to recover steadily, and he is now less dependent on supplemental oxygen—mainly using high-flow nasal cannulas at night when needed. His limited arm mobility, which was noticeable during his public appearance on March 23, is due to a pre-existing injury and not related to his hospitalization. Dr. Alfieri will continue weekly medical visits to monitor the Pope’s health. In the most recent update from the Holy See Press Office, released on Tuesday, April 1, Pope Francis' condition remains stable. Blood tests show normal results, and a recent chest X-ray indicates improvement in his pulmonary infection. Therapies continue, focusing on motor function, breathing, and voice rehabilitation. He remains active in spirit and work: sitting at his desk, concelebrating daily Mass in the chapel at Casa Santa Marta, and engaging with his closest collaborators. Despite the recovery, the Pope has been placed under a two-month period of rest and convalescence, meaning he will not be attending public events. The Office for Liturgical Celebrations confirmed that he will not preside over the Jubilee for the Sick on April 5–6; instead, Monsignor Rino Fisichella will lead in his place. Still, the Pope’s sense of humor and pastoral presence shine through. When Dr. Alfieri told him he had the mind of a 50- or 60-year-old, Pope Francis quipped, “Not 50—40!” In his Sunday message on March 30, Pope Francis offered a personal reflection: “Let us live this Lent, especially during the Jubilee, as a time of healing. I am also experiencing it this way, in soul and body. Frailty and illness unite us—but more importantly, we are united in the salvation Christ has given us.” As for Holy Week services and the Sunday Angelus, the Vatican has yet to confirm the Pope’s involvement. His homily for Mass on April 6 will be prepared by him but read aloud by Monsignor Fisichella. One thing is clear: while the Pope is physically healing, his spirit remains strong—ever determined to lead, even from a place of rest.

Discover the Sacrament of the Anointing of the Sick, a sacred rite of healing and grace. Learn its significance, who can receive it, how it brings spiritual and physical strength, and its role in offering comfort and peace through God’s mercy Anointing of the Sick Anointing of the Sick, formerly known as Extreme Unction, is a sacrament that is administered to give strength and comfort to the ill and to mystically unite their suffering with that of Christ during his Passion and death. This sacrament can be given to those who are afflicted with serious illness or injury, those who are awaiting surgery , the weakened elderly, or to ill children who are old enough to understand its significance. A person can receive the sacrament as many times as needed throughout their life, and a person with a chronic illness might be anointed again if the disease worsens. The rite can be performed in a home or hospital by a priest , who prays over the person and anoints their head and hands with chrism (holy oil). The priest may also administer the sacrament of the Eucharist if the person has been unable to receive it and can hear a confession if so desired. If a person is at the point of death, the priest also administers a special Apostolic blessing in what is known as the Last Rites. Why Call a Priest Early for Someone Who Is Critically Ill? When a loved one is critically ill or near death, it is essential to call a priest without delay. Our Lord, in His infinite mercy, has provided a special sacrament for this stage of life—the Sacrament of the Anointing of the Sick. This sacrament offers spiritual strength, healing, and peace to those who are seriously ill or in danger of death. Often, families wait until the last possible moment, hoping for medical recovery. While we trust in the skills of doctors, there comes a point when medicine can do no more. At such a time, delaying the call to a priest may deprive the sick person of the powerful graces that this sacrament bestows. Through the Anointing of the Sick , the person receives: ✅ Union with the Passion of Christ – Their suffering is united with Christ’s suffering, giving it spiritual meaning and redemptive value. ✅ Strength to Endure Illness or Old Age – The sacrament grants divine grace to bear suffering with courage and peace. ✅ Forgiveness of Sins – If the person is unable to confess, this sacrament brings reconciliation with God. ✅ Restoration of Health – If it is God’s will, this sacrament can bring physical healing. ✅ Preparation for Eternal Life – For those near death, it provides peace and readiness to meet the Lord. Calling a priest early ensures that the sick person receives these graces with full awareness and in a peaceful state. Let us not wait until it is too late—this sacrament is a gift of love, mercy, and hope, meant to be received in faith and trust.

Discover the importance of confession in the Catholic faith. Learn about its purpose, spiritual benefits, and how it brings reconciliation, forgiveness, and peace with God WHAT IS RECONCILIATION (CONFESSION)? Confession is a sacrament instituted by Jesus Christ in His love and mercy to offer sinners forgiveness for offenses committed against God. At the same time, sinners reconcile with the Church, because it is also wounded by our sins. Also known as Confession or Penance, the sacrament of Reconciliation is seen as an opportunity for renewal and can be done as often as needed. Some Catholics participate weekly before receiving the Eucharist , whereas others may seek the sacrament only during the penitential seasons of Lent or Advent . Reconciliation is a means of obtaining pardon from God for sins for which the sinner is truly remorseful and brings the sinner back into communion with God and the Church. The sacrament is an opportunity for self-reflection and requires that the person take full responsibility for his or her sins, both those in thought and in action. During the rite, sins are recounted privately to a priest, who is seen as a healer aiding the process, and the priest commonly assigns acts of penance, such as specific prayers or acts of restitution, to complete in the following days. A prayer of contrition is offered at the end of the confession, and the newly absolved Catholic is urged to refrain from repeating those sins.

Called by God: My Journey to the Priesthood Experiencing God’s Love and Saying Yes to His Call Introduction: Family background and upbringing I am Fr. Vincent Barboza, a diocesan priest for the Archdiocese of Bombay. Born and raised in a traditional Catholic family in Mumbai, faith was the cornerstone of our household. The family rosary was a daily ritual, and Sunday Mass was non-negotiable, except in cases of illness. Despite being a devout Catholic, the thought of priesthood never crossed my mind. The Turning Point: God's Experience at the retreat Looking back, I can clearly see how God’s hand guided me, step by step, toward the priesthood. The journey began with a transformative experience at a Charismatic Retreat in Khandala, a serene hill station on the outskirts of Mumbai. The retreat was led by Frs. Rufus Pereira and James D’Souza. During one of my personal prayer moments, I stepped outside to connect with nature—breathing in the fresh air and listening to the melodious chirping of birds. With my Bible in hand, I prayed using Psalm 104, where the psalmist praises God for the splendor of His creation: "How many are your works, Lord! In wisdom you made them all; the earth is full of your creatures." (Psalm 104:24) As I read, the psalmist’s words became my own. I felt an overwhelming sense of God’s love and presence. It was as if the words of Scripture came alive, speaking directly to my heart. This profound encounter with God in the midst of His creation has stayed with me ever since. Alongside this, I developed a deep love for the Eucharist. During Mass, I felt a tangible connection with God. By the end of the retreat, my relationship with the Lord had transformed—it was now real, personal, and alive.After this experience, I became more intentional about my spiritual life. Attending Mass and fulfilling my spiritual duties were no longer obligations but desires. I joined the parish Charismatic Prayer Group and became an active member of the church. Yet, even with this deepened faith, the idea of joining the seminary did not occur to me. Khandala Retreat Centre Hearing God’s Call in Bahrain In 1991, an unexpected opportunity came my way: a job with a food supply company in Manama, Bahrain. My main concern was whether I could attend Mass, at least on Sundays, in a predominantly Muslim country. To my delight, Bahrain allowed Christians to practice their faith, and I soon became a regular at Sacred Heart Church in Manama—not just on Sundays but daily. Immersing myself in church activities, I joined the Charismatic Prayer Group, the Legion of Mary, and served as an usher at Masses.It was in this multicultural parish that I truly experienced the universality of the Church, where people from diverse nationalities and cultures came together to worship the same God. One day, during Mass, I felt a profound call to the priesthood. Immediately after Mass, I approached an elderly religious priest to share my experience. Much to my surprise, he gently curbed my enthusiasm and encouraged me to take my time for thoughtful discernment. Sacred Heart Church, Bahrain Challenges: Struggles in discerning the call Returning to India in 1994, I became absorbed in work and set aside thoughts of a vocation. Then one day, an elderly couple visited me, and during our conversation, the topic of vocations arose. The woman recounted two cautionary stories: one of a man destined for priesthood who chose marriage and was unhappy, and another of a man called to married life who entered the seminary but found no peace. Her words struck a chord. I humbly shared my experience of God’s call in Bahrain, and she encouraged me to meet the seminary rector. Overcoming Family Challenges The rector Fr. Caesar D'Mello and seminary professors guided me through a process of discernment, ultimately confirming the authenticity of my call. When I informed my family, my father initially struggled with the idea. Being the youngest of four brothers and one sister, he had hoped I would stay close to him. However, after several heartfelt discussions, he gave me his blessing, and my family rallied around my decision. St. Pius X Seminary, Goregaon, Mumbai The Decision: Steps to join the seminary In 1996, at the age of 30, I entered St. Pius X Major Seminary. After eight years of formation, I was ordained a priest on April 17, 2004, by the late Ivan Cardinal Dias. Looking back, I can see how God orchestrated every step. He gave me a personal experience of His love, nurtured my devotion to the Eucharist, and prepared my heart to embrace the priesthood. Life as a priest and gratitude to God Now, after 20 years as a priest, I can confidently say that I made the right decision. Serving God and His people has given my life meaning and fulfillment. I am deeply grateful for the grace to respond to His call, despite the challenges along the way. My prayer is that other young men may also find the The Ordination of Fr. Vincent Barboza to say "yes" to God’s call and discover the joy it brings. To God be the glory! Fr. Vincent Barboza A Blessed Day: My Ordination to Priesthood Share Your Story If you are inspired by Fr. Vincent's vocation story, feel free to share your own story with us In this Jubilee Year let us share God's love and mercy by sharing our faith and vocation stories Email to us your story at: jy2025withvincent@gmail.com If you’re discerning your vocation, please contact us or to your parish priest for guidance or prayer. comments debug टिप्पणियां एक टिप्पणी लिखें एक टिप्पणी लिखें अपने विचार साझा करें टिप्पणी करने वाले पहले व्यक्ति बनें।

Discover the significance of Baptism and its role in the Christian faith. Explore key topics including the meaning of Baptism, infant vs. adult Baptism, role of godparents and many other topics. What is Baptism? Baptism, the first sacrament of Christian life Is Baptism for Infant or Adult This page explores the Catholic teaching on Baptism for both, its biblical foundation, and the importance of receiving this sacrament at any stage of life. Is Baptism by pouring or immersion or both? This article explains the different valid forms of Baptism in the Catholic Church The role of Godparents The article explores the role of godparents, their responsibilities and the Church’s requirements, and the significance of their role in nurturing a strong Christian life."

Welcome to our Website! Explore inspiring Christian contents, faith-filled resources and engaging videos to uplift your spirit and guide you on your journey of faith. Discover hope, courage and joy of living a purpose driven life. Welcome to Fr. Vincent Barboza's Official Website Your journey of faith, enlightenment, and spiritual growth begins here. At frvincentbarboza.com, our mission is to inspire, educate, and guide you to live a Christ-centered life. Rooted in the call to be "the salt of the earth and light of the world" (Mt 5:13-16), this platform offers resources to deepen your understanding of the Catholic faith and enrich your spiritual journey. Explore Our Offerings: Weekly Sunday Reflections to inspire your faith journey. Stories of transformation and grace shared in the Testimonies section. Thought-provoking Articles and Blog posts on contemporary issues and timeless truths. Multimedia Content featuring videos and reflections to connect with messages of hope and faith. Engaging Q&A to address your questions about faith, theology, and Church teachings. Whether you are seeking answers, spiritual renewal, or a deeper connection with God, you’ll find valuable insights and resources here. Let’s journey together to bring meaning, purpose, and God’s light into your life. Join the Mission Stay connected through our reflections and resources. Explore, engage, and grow in faith today.

The Healing Prayer of Command is a powerful prayer that calls upon the authority of Jesus Christ to command healing over sickness, pain, and affliction. Just as Jesus commanded healing in the Gospels, believers can pray with boldness, trusting in His divine authority to restore health and wholeness. Healing Prayer of Command Precious Lord Jesus, You came into the world to heal our infirmities and endure our sufferings. You went about healing all who were sick and bringing comfort to those in pain. By a simple command you rebuked Peter’s mother-in-law’s fever. You spoke directly to the illness, condemned it for its actions and commanded it to leave her body. In the same way, Lord, you have called all of your disciples to follow your example. You have given us power over all the works of the enemy and sent us forth to make disciples of all nations. In the healing tradition of the church, and through my obedience to your written Word, I hereby take authority over all forms of sickness and disease that have been attacking my body. In the name of Jesus, under the power and authority of the Lord God Almighty, I command all forms of demonic illness to leave my body now and go straight to the feet of Jesus Christ. Your assignment and influences are over. I rebuke all pain in the name of Jesus, and I command it to get out of my body right now. I rebuke all spirits of infirmity, nerve disorder, lung disorder, brain disorder, heart disease, AIDS, cancer, hypochondria, fatigue, anorexia, leukemia, arthritis, tumors, abnormal growths, diabetes and all other forms of sickness to leave my body now in the name of Jesus. Lord Jesus, I thank you for your healing power. I ask you to send forth your ministering, medical and surgical angels, to repair and restore any damage that was caused in my body by the presence of sin, sickness or demonically influenced infirmities. I ask that you send forth your Holy Spirit and fill me with your love, light, peace and joy. Come Holy Spirit and transform me into the child of God that you intended me to be. I pray in your Precious Holy Name. Amen

Catholicism4Catholics is a series of talks designed to deepen the faith and understanding of Catholics by exploring essential Church teachings. Rooted in Scripture, Tradition, and the Magisterium, these sessions provide clear and insightful explanations on key doctrines, helping participants grow in their Catholic identity and confidently live out their faith. Catholicism4Catholics Catholicism4Catholics is a series of talks designed to deepen the faith and understanding of Catholics by exploring essential Church teachings. Rooted in Scripture, Tradition, and the Magisterium, these sessions provide clear and insightful explanations on key doctrines, helping participants grow in their Catholic identity and confidently live out their faith.

Wisdom for Life Our Perspective is Defined by Our Expectations